Posts Tagged "Yahoo"

Will There Ever Be A Yahoo – Google Partnership?

Posted on Nov 14, 2012 in Guest Posts, Marketing, Social Media |

Will There Ever Be A Yahoo – Google Partnership?

Guest Post by Dan Chaney

Before Google dominated the search engine market, the #1 place to go for information on anything was Yahoo. No one could go outside or watch TV without seeing one of their ads each day. Today, Yahoo is not in good shape. Some internet users either think it’s dead or have no idea what it is. At one point, a few companies tried to buy the company but the execs and shareholders refused the offers. However, no one has thought of a partnership. Will Yahoo ever do such a thing with Google or someone else? The short answer is maybe.

Yahoo could use some help in some form or another. Their net income is at $228.5 million according to their Q2 2012 earnings report, which has been in decline for some time. They’ve also had many of their top-level execs either leave or have been let go over the past six years. Add on the fact that they’re having to compete for business with two juggernaut-sized companies (Google and Microsoft) and it becomes clear that Yahoo has a massive hill to climb if they wish to stay open.

Google, Yahoo, & BingA partnership of some could work in their favor, but it depends on what the other party would offer them. The first thing they need is more people using their search engine. Without that, there’s not much of a reason to visit except to check e-mail and read the news. Original content would also help. If Yahoo offers something people want to see or read that can’t be found elsewhere, there’s a good chance that they’ll be able to convince users and investors to give them a second look. In short, they’d have to utilize multiple services from one company or team up with multiple companies to remain afloat.

At some point, Yahoo will have to do something big to attract the attention of internet users and businesses alike. If they can’t offer better services and content than its competition, it’ll have to put itself up for sale and hope for the best. A partnership with Google would help, but only if it’ll convince people to come to their site on a regular basis aside from checking and sending email. Also, it’ll depend on which services the partnership will improve. Otherwise, the deal may turn out to be an expensive waste of time for all parties involved.

One way or another, Yahoo needs to get its house in order. Will that include a partnership of some kind? Only time will tell. Given the history they’ve had when it comes to being bought up, the folks in charge may choose to do things on their own until all of their efforts fall flat before striking a deal with anyone.

Dan Chaney is a blogger for HirePulse advertising with a background in social media and marketing.

Read More

Adding Variety to Anchor Text for a Natural Backlink Profile

Posted on Sep 14, 2011 in Guest Posts, Marketing |

Guest Post by Andy Wallner

If you’ve ever encountered SEO, you know that the whole idea of search optimization is often a battle against search engines, not with them. The life of an SEO expert consists of constantly seeking ways to “trick” Google into thinking that people love your site, even if you’ve only had a few visitors (or have other, more financially related motives). Far too often, SEOers (that’s a word, right?) tend to find the quickest, dirtiest, and easiest ways to bring visibility to their sites, and forget that there’s actually a missing human element. Get big enough in a competitive vertical, and Google might pick your site to be analyzed by their engineers (I’ve seen giants toppled because of this).

It’s unlikely that you’ll ever actually trick a search engineer. But launching obvious link building campaigns can set off some red flags that bring negative attention to your efforts. So, what’s the best way to make sure that Google knows you’re not getting all natural links? Forgetting to add variety to your anchor text.

The State of Anchor Text

Anchor text is a puzzling thing to many new web marketers. Let’s say, for example, that you operate the site marketingdegree.net, and want to generate more traffic by targeting some keywords. What would you do? The phrase “marketing degree” seems to be pretty valuable, so we might target that alone. And that would make sense as many people would refer to the site like I just did above. With an exact match domain, the job is fairly simple and natural links are more likely to come in how I want them.

Click Here!Now, let’s consider a different scenario. Let’s suppose I went a different route with a “brandable domain.” Google wanted to be more than a website (that’s why they didn’t pick searchengine.com). So, they chose a brand. Suppose I chose something like “Google.com” for my site in some alternate Internet universe. How likely would it be that everyone would link to me using the phrase “marketing degree?” Pretty unlikely unless I was already dominating the SERPs. People would link to me in all sorts of ways, from “click here” to “this site doesn’t agree with my opinion, however” as the anchor text. In fact, some companies have accidentally ranked for that anchor text – try searching Google for “click here” and you’ll find some pretty powerful players on page one (Adobe, Wikipedia, Apple, Mapquest and Yahoo!). When I got big enough, people would likely link to me primarily using “Google.”

Still, conversions matter. Adobe probably isn’t making any money by ranking number one in Google for “click here,” even though AdWords is telling me that I’m one of about 22,200 that searches for it every month and there is no advertising competition whatsoever for the term (jackpot right?). The chances of monetizing such a broad keyword phrase are slim (especially with all those heavy hitters dominating it in Google).

Adding That Variety

Anchor text for incoming links is vital to your success, but it’s not everything. You can think of links as having two different types of “juice” – the normal, delicious kind that passes reputation (called page rank by Google), and the just as delicious juice called “passing anchor text.” It’s far more complicated, but think of it like this:

  • Any old link builds your site’s reputation with Google, and helps you rank slightly for all search terms relevant to your site’s content.
  • Anchor text helps you rank for specific terms.

So why is it that so many beginning SEO enthusiasts set out on a link building campaign to build thousands of links using the same exact anchor text every time? Can you think of anything less natural? You can sit back and wait for the links to come naturally (like Google wants you to…), or you can add a little variety to your anchor text to avoid setting off any alarms.

First, consider the two juices of a link. As long as a backlink doesn’t come from the bad neighborhood of the Internet (spam land and porn, gambling, etc.), a link is pretty much a link. In other words, getting a link can never hurt you. Otherwise, every spammer in the world would be sending thousands of terrible links to their competitors’ sites to shut them down. This doesn’t mean you need to spend hours getting a link from a PR 0 site either though.

So feel free to mix up your anchor text – a lot. Think about all of the ways a person might reference your site and its content and write them down. How do you talk to people about your services? Furthermore, what value does your site offer?

Using the Long Tail for Anchor Text Ideas

Think of a nice long tail keyword phrase that you’d like to target, preferably one that sums up everything your site has to offer – luxury vacations in Egypt for senior citizens, for example. If you divide that long tail phrase into smaller phrases (luxury vacations, vacations in Egypt, senior citizen vacations, etc.), then come up with all of the variations for those phrases (vacation over 65, holiday in Egypt, Egyptian vacations, and so on), you have a nice list of natural anchor text for your link building campaign.

You’ve successfully made a connection to everything your site has to offer, without spamming the same anchor text over and over again. Your efforts look much more natural to everyone involved – the Google robots and humans alike. And don’t worry too much about not ranking for your targeted keyword phrase. Search engine results don’t work that way. After all, why would Google design a system that relies on unnatural activity to yield natural results?

You might even add a few odd anchor text links to make things squeaky clean, like “I love this site” or “good news for us all.” You’ll still get the link juice.

Finally, if anyone reading this has the guts, free time, and extra cash to try to get their site on the first page for “click here,” please let Trisha know so I can send you a batch of my almost world famous banana bread (only if you’re successful, please!). Unfortunately, I lack all three of my aforementioned elements to do so myself, but I have plenty of banana bread at the moment.

Final Note: I must make one thing clear for those that are about to leave an angry comment. We’re not discussing exact match domain names right now. If you have an exact match domain, adding a lot of variety to your exact match anchor text isn’t really all that necessary, except if you’re branching out to other keyword phrases. You spent enough money on the domain to impress Google already, and they’ll fully expect thousands of links to come to it using your website name as the anchor text.

Andy Wallner is a freelance writer and web developer that specializes in providing information to students considering a marketing degree, or interested in online and offline marketing information. In his free time, Andy enjoys kayaking, playing trombone in a local jazz band, and learning CSS.

Read More

ad:tech San Francisco: The New Power Brokers – Apple, Facebook, Google, Twitter & Beyond

Posted on May 3, 2011 in Conferences & Networking |

Session Description: Whether you’re launching a company, marketing a product or just keeping your head above water, it’s likely that you’re increasingly forced to plot your strategy around today’s new power brokers—Google, Facebook, Apple and Twitter. Does the relative hegemony and power of these companies create a stable, predictable environment for the rest of us, or are we continually guessing what the next chess move will do to our plans? In this highly interactive and thought-provoking segment, Upstream Group CEO Doug Weaver brings together experts from the capital markets, industry journalism and agency leadership to explore the impact of these companies on M&A, marketing and advertising. Are these players permanent fixtures, or are there new power brokers waiting in the wings? And what do you need to know to make the very best decisions in the months ahead?

This session took place Tuesday, April 12, 2011. The speakers:

  • Doug Weaver, Founder & CEO, Upstream Group (Moderator)
  • Shawn Carolan, Managing Director, Menlo Ventures
  • Scott Symonds, General Manager Media, AKQA
  • Molly Wood, Executive Editor, CNET.com

I enjoyed the discussion, though I wish there had been more actionable items.

Bullet Point Review!

  • Only 10% of Twitter accounts follow more than 50 people.
  • What is a tweet worth as opposed to a Facebook news update?
  • This curve is pretty similar to any participatory medium.
  • 1 in 4 twitter users are African-American, which is sort of the mirrored opposite of Facebook.
  • Does Amazon belong on this list instead?
    • Already selling more digital books than printed books.
    • Many start-ups use their services for storage, hosting, etc.
    • $36 billion in ecommerce in 2010
    • Who is empowered?  They’re more about empowering themselves, not other sellers or users.
  • They’ve all built really nice walled gardens.  Does that make the web less relevant & by association, Google less relevant?
  • When you solve problems, you grow the market.
  • You still find all these walled gardens through Google.
  • Google is tying bonuses to social media strategy (up to 25%).
  • The personal recommendation is the absolute social currency of web 3.0.
  • Google should let Groupon and Facebook have their  games & get really good at search.
  • Is the web less relevant with Facebook around?
  • “Control, distribution, & delivery of content is the next battleground.” – Molly Wood
  • Clients are more willing to go where good content & readers are instead of the more traditional media outlets.
  • NBC/Comcast is just one example of vertical integration where one party own a both the content & the pipe.
  • Kinect has reinvigorated some new life into Microsoft.
  • Yahoo might have some life left in them.
  • AOL? Made some good hires and good acquisitions & trying hard, especially with local & patch, but it remains to be seen.
  • Who may end up being a power broker in 5-10 years? Apple may not be as people go towards open source, Facebook & Google may be, but ones aggregating content will be ones to watch. Lots of potential with foursquare. Blogging may overturn.
Read More

IAB Revising Interactive Ad Units

Posted on Apr 30, 2009 in Affiliate Marketing |

The Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB) today announced that it has held its first meeting of the Re-Imagining Interactive Advertising Task Force, comprised of top online publishers, media agencies and, for the first time, creative officers from the nation’s leading advertising agencies. Their purpose is to examine the current standards and update them, taking into consideration the evolution of online advertising.

“We believe we can make interactive advertising far more hospitable to the craft and practice of persuasion by putting creativity front and center in the development of advertising standards,” said Randall Rothenberg, President and CEO of the IAB. “By bringing creative agency leaders into the discussion of the standards, we highlight our industry-wide mission to showcase brands and engaging consumers in meaningful ways.”

The IAB first established a set of standards for interactive advertising in 2002.  These standards have become the golden rule in online advertising, be it traditional CPM or affiliate advertising.  The board includes players from heavy hitters like Cars.com, Disney Interactive Media Group, Google, Platform-A, Microsoft Advertising, Yahoo, and Turner Broadcasting System, Inc.

Also coming out of the IAB today is their Impression Exchange Solution.  This document sheds light on impression data and makes it easy to convert to a single standard that all publishers will recognize.

The document identifies the key functional requirements necessary for the automated exchange of impression data between publishers and third-party ad servers, which will allow publishers and agencies to detect and address discrepancies in near real-time.

Their goal is to minimize discrepancies in online data.  Good luck to the IAB!

Read More

CJU Course: Innocent Until Proven Guilty

Posted on Oct 12, 2008 in Affiliate Marketing, Conferences & Networking |

his is the last of my notes, finally!  This panel promised to deliver real live examples from advertisers and publishers who have faced the best practices issues and discovered the resolutions that helped both sides continue a successful working relationship. The panel consisted of:

  • Brian Conchuratt, Sr. Sales Manager, Commission Junction (Moderator)
  • Matt Earls, Sr. Marketing Manager, Yahoo!
  • David M. Lewis, CEO & Founder, Cashbaq
  • Kurt Lohse, CEO & Founder, Keycode.com
  • Maggie Tucker, Manager of Performance Marketing, Intercontinental Hotels Group

I didn’t get many notes from this session, but it was some good stuff.

Bullet Point Review!

  • 2009 is the year of the data feeds.
  • CJ is listening to publisher complaints about data feed accuracy and uniformity.
  • Threshold of quality needs to be raised on CJ so advertisers can take advantage of IT resources effectively when asking for the creation of data feeds.
  • Utilizing data feeds is top priority for the top publishers.
  • Advertisers wonder if anyone’s listening?  Always looking for better ways to speak to publishers.
  • Understand what your core publishers need.  Give them exactly what they want.
  • Lead time is good to make it easy.
  • Don’t mark offers urgent if they’re not – publishers need to appropriate their time wisely.
  • Understand how your publishers want to communicate, whether it’s IM, email, phone, etc.
  • It’s difficult to write one email for all publishers.
  • -> Don’t worry about flashy templates, data is the most important aspect.
  • -> Segment to different publisher groups and address their needs.
  • Keycodes white labels their syndicated content.
  • Publishers should tell the advertisers straight out if they develop a new promotional method.
  • The higher the trust level, the more aggressive you can be with payouts.
  • Look at click-through URLs, conversion rate, cancellation rates.
  • -> Not looking for secret recipe, but just a general idea of what the publisher is doing.
  • Good publishers are looking to be transparent and will let you know when they’re experimenting.
  • Violation of T&Cs us more of an opportunity to start a conversation than to punish.
  • Affiliates are direct marketers.
  • Run the numbers before you go to publishers with unappealing offers or news to prove it’s necessary.

There was no time for Q&A on this panel, but there are definitely some good take away tidbits.  This concludes all my notes from CJU!  Until next year…

Read More

CJU Course: Affiliate Marketing 101

Posted on Sep 17, 2008 in Affiliate Marketing, Conferences & Networking | 1 comment

As the first course of the conference yesterday, I’m sure there was a lot of pressure for this hour and fifteen minutes to really set the tone for the three days of Commission Junction University.  Titled “Affiliate Marketing 101: Back to the Basics”, I attended hoping to maybe pick up some things I didn’t actually know considering I taught a lot of the basics to myself a couple years back.  The speaker was:

  • Jeremy Palmer, President, QuitYourDayJob.com

I converse with & follow him on twitter and I’ve heard great things about his last projects The Black Ink Projects and Black Ink 2, although haven’t had a chance to check it out myself.  I won’t know until Thursday if this session really did set the appropriate tone for the conference or not, but it was definitely worth my attendance!

Bullet Point Review!

  • Choose Your Niche
    • The niche you choose should be your passion – it’s the easiest foundation to build upon.
    • Know a lot about your niche to be successful.
  • Develop a Business Plan
    • Put together a SWOT analysis for you AND your closest competitors – their weaknesses can be your opportunities.
    • Just make it a simple spreadsheet.
    • Have a unique selling proposition.  It’s not enough to just copy someone else, you have to see what they’re doing and how you can do it better.
    • Learn about the customer persona.
    • Inventory your own skills objectively – what can you do yourself and what would you be best served by outsourcing?
  • Write Value Added Content
    • Start writing content before you design your site.
    • Content is the key to the site.
    • Have 10-15 pages of content before you launch to improve Quality Score.
  • Design Your Site
    • You must have professional tools to create a professional site.
    • Be objective about your experience and consider outsourcing.
    • TOOL: 99Designs for design contests – you only pay for the winner, and you pay much less.
  • Develop Your Site
    • Outsourcing programming can be done on Elance or oDesk quite effectively.
    • Be sure to write extremely detailed specifications on what you want the site to do and how it should be done when using outsourced talent.
    • With these services you can escrow your payment so that no money is released until certain milestones are done – and done to your satisfaction.
  • Test the Waters with PPC
    • Google hates “rich pages” (also referred to as “thin landing pages”) where the only intent is a conversion.
    • Google recently updated their algorithms and human QC when assigning Quality Scores, so be sure to read up.
    • Essentially Google wants you to develop your own content: they want independent reviews, content not found directly on the merchant’s website, and the comparison of several merchants.
    • Many affiliates have had good success with video reviews because they resonate more with consumers.
    • Remember that Google isn’t the only game in town – test on Yahoo & MSN to discover what works in terms of keywords and ad copy.
  • Test & Optimize
    • Look at conversions using keywords.
    • TOOLS: Tracking 202 (free), Prosper 202 (free), Optimize My Site (paid), Google Website Optimizer (free).
    • Pay equal attention to conversion rate and click through rate.
    • Don’t use vague or hype laden copy – it won’t convert well.
    • Split test your landing pages.
  • Build a Sustainable Business.
    • Don’t put all your eggs in one basket.
    • You want to thrive without Google just in case.
    • Facebook Ads are growing with better ROI.
    • Remember the viral marketing element (what can you do that people will pass on?)
    • You want to be who people will think of when they think of your niche.
    • Create a brand for yourself.
  • Random Tips

Points brought up during the Q&A

  • Mobile has great opportunities for merchants and advertisers, but it’s hard for affiliates.  People are not (yet) likely to use mobile devices to make purchases.
  • Outsourcing content?  Elance is ok but Jeremy expressed some displeasure with what he’s got from that site.  An audience member suggested PR Newswire and searching for keywords to find experts.
    • My own suggestion is to try going to LinkedIn & looking for experts to approach for writing.
  • Go where the good designers and writers hang out to find them – when you go to freelancing sites you’re getting the people who might be hard up for work and not that great of results.
  • In regards to CJ, pay a lot of attention to the Network Earnings bar.
  • Once your site’s Quality Score tanks, you’re done.  You have to start over with a new site because there’s no way to get that back.

Jeremy did an excellent job mixing up the experience level of the information he put forth, knowing instinctively that most people attending wouldn’t quite be at the 101 education level in regards to affiliate marketing.

Read More